en_windows_10_business_editions_version_2004_updated_may_2020_x64_dvd_aa8db2cc.iso and windows password recovery BootCD ventoy.json should be placed at the 1st partition which has the larger capacity (The partition to store ISO files). Latest Ventoy release introduces experimental IMG format support https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat Well, that's pretty much exactly what I suggested in points 1-4 from the original post, with point 4 altered from "an error should be returned to the user and bootx64.efi should not be launched" to "an error should be returned to the user who can then decide if they still want to launch bootx64.efi". Assert efi error status invalid parameter Smartadm.ru Happy to be proven wrong, I learned quite a bit from your messages. I don't remember if the shortcut is ctrl i or ctrl r for grub mode. my pleasure and gladly happen :) You were able to use TPM for disk encryption long before Secure Boot, and rightfully so, since the process of storing and using data encryption keys is completely different from the process of storing and using trust chain keys to validate binary executables (being able to decrypt something is very different from being able to trust something). Haven't tried installing it on bare metal, but it does install to a VM with the LabConfig bypasses. I'm afraid I'm very busy with other projects, so I haven't had a chance. Ventoy No Boot File Found For Uefi - My Blog I checked and they don't work. Option 1: Completly by pass the secure boot like the current release. But I was actually talking about CorePlus. Newbie. function gennr(){var n=480678,t=new Date,e=t.getMonth()+1,r=t.getDay(),a=parseFloat("0. I test it in a VirtualMachine (VMWare with secure boot enabled). Hi FadeMind, the woraround for that Problem with WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso is that you must copy the SSTR to the root of yout USB drive than all apps are avalaible. ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi An encoding issue, perhaps (for the text)? backbox-7-desktop-amd64.iso - 2.47 GB, emmabuntus-de3-amd64-10.3-1.01.iso - 3.37 GB, pentoo-full-amd64-hardened-2019.2.iso - 4 GB 1. For more information on how to download and install Ventoy on Windows 10/11, we have a guide for that. For secure boot please refer Secure Boot . WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso BOOT but Custom launcher cannot open custom path and unable access to special apps. You were able to use TPM for disk encryption long before Secure Boot, and rightfully so, since the process of storing and using data encryption keys is completely different from the process of storing and using trust chain keys to validate binary executables (being able to decrypt something is very different from being able to trust something). 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. Hiren's Boot CD with UEFI support? - Super User Boots, but unable to find its own files; specifically, does not find boot device and waits user input to find its root device. While Ventoy is designed to boot in with secure boot enabled, if your computer does not support the secure boot feature, then an error will result. Help !!!!!!! Personally, I don't have much of an issue with Ventoy using the current approach as a stopgap solution, as long as it is agreed that this is only a stopgap, since it comes with a huge drawback, and that a better solution (validation of that the UEFI bootloaders chain loaded from GRUB pass Secure Boot validation when Secure Boot has been enabled by the user) needs to be implemented in the long run. There are many suggestion to use tools which make an ISO bootable with UEFI on a flash disk, however it's not that easy as you can only do that with UEFI-enabled ISO's. By UEFI enabled ISO's I mean that the ISO files contain a BOOT\EFI directory with a EFI bootloader. Then Ventoy will load without issue if the secure boot is enabled in the BIOS. VentoyU allows users to update and install ISO files on the USB drive. I am not using a grub external menu. I assume that file-roller is not preserving boot parameters, use another iso creation tool. And unfortunately, because Ventoy is derived from GRUB 2.0, the only way it could run in a Secure Boot environment (without using MokManager) is if it is loaded through a SHIM. I was able to create a Rufus image using "GPT for UEFI" and the latest Windows ISO (1709 updated in 12/2017). Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. I will give more clear warning message for unsigned efi file when secure boot is enabled. I can confirm it was the reason for some ISOs to not boot (ChimeraOS, Manjaro Gnome). Mybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! These WinPE have different user scripts inside the ISO files. It looks cool. As with pretty much any other security solution, the point of Secure Boot is mitigation ("If you have enabled Secure Boot then it means you want to be notified about bootloaders that do not match the signatures you allow") and right now, Ventoy results in a complete bypass of this mitigation, which is why I raised this matter. I have the same error with EndeavorOS_Atlantis_neo_21_5.iso using ventoy 1.0.70. the EndeavorOS iso boots with no issues when on it's on usb, but not through ventoy. Some Legacy BIOS has an access limitation and wont read a disk that exceeds the limitation. Ventoy loads Linux kernels directly, which are also signed with embedded Shim certificate. Even debian is problematic with this laptop. Yes, anybody can make a UEFI bootloader that chain loads unsigned bootloaders with the express purpose of defeating Secure Boot. , Laptop based platform: @steve6375 can u test ? The point is that if a user whitelists Ventoy using MokManager, they are responsible for anything that they then subsequently run using Ventoy. to your account. 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. No bootfile found for UEFI! Issue #313 ventoy/Ventoy GitHub but CorePure64-13.1.iso does not as it does not contain any EFI boot files. Users enabled Secure Boot to be warned if a boot loader fails Secure Boot validation, regardless of where that bootloader is executed from. But even the user answer "YES, I don't care, just boot it." 2.-verificar que la arquitectura de la imagen iso sea compatible con el procesador, 1.-modo uefi: The live folder is similar to Debian live. Legacy? It's the BIOS that decides the boot mode not Ventoy. Remove Ventoy secure boot key. So even when someone physically unplugs my SSD and installs a malicious bootloader/OS to it, it won't be able to decrypt the main OS partition. You need to create a directory with name ventoy and put ventoy.json in this directory(that is \ventoy\ventoy.json). In this situation, with current Ventoy architecture, nothing will boot (even Fedora ISO), because the validation (and loading) files signed with Shim certificate requires support from the bootloader and every chainloaded .efi file (it uses custom protocol, regular EFI functions can't be used. I think it's OK. This means current is UEFI mode. @steve6375 My guesd is it does not. For instance, it could be that only certain models of PC have this problem with certain specific ISOs. # Archlinux minimal Install with btrfs ## Introduction If you don't know about Arch Linux, and willing to learn, then check this post, - [Arch Linux](https://wiki . ElementaryOS boots just fine. Discovery and usage of shim protocol of loaded shim binary for global UEFI validation functions (validation policy override with shim verification), Shim protocol unregistration of loaded shim binary (to prevent confusion among shims of multiple vendors and registration of multiple protocols which are handled by different chainloaded shims). It is pointless to try to enforce Secure Boot from a USB drive. Vmware) with UEFI mode and to confirm that the ISO file does support UEFI mode. also for my friend's at OpenMandriva *waaavvvveee* Anything Debian-based fails to boot for me across two computers and several versions of Ventoy. However, I guess it should be possible to automatically enroll ALL needed keys to shim from grub module on the first boot (when the user enrolls my ENROLL_THIS_CERT_INTO_MOKMANAGER.crt) and handle unsigned efi binaries as a special case or just require to sign them with user-generated key? Remain what in the install program Ventoy2Disk.exe . In a fit of desperation, I tried another USB drive - this one 64GB instead of 8GB. When you run into problem when booting an image file, please make sure that the file is not corrupted. Ventoy - Open source USB boot utility for both BIOS and UEFI Windows 7 32-bit does not support UEFI32 - you must use Win7 64-bit.. You may need to disable Secure Boot in your BIOS settings first (or convert the ISO to a .imgPTN23 file using the MPI Tool Kit). https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s. If you really want to mount it, you can use the experimental option VTOY_LINUX_REMOUNT in Global Control Plugin. Now, if Microsoft finally relinquished their abusive policy about not accepting GPLv3 code for Secure Boot signing and Ventoy was updated not to allow unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled (i.e. Any ideas? 1: The Windows 7 USB/DVD Download Tool is not compatible with USB 3.0. yes, but i try with rufus, yumi, winsetuptousb, its okay. However, per point 12 of the link I posted above, requirements for becoming a SHIM provider are a lot more stringent than for just getting a bootloader signed by Microsoft, though I'm kind of hoping that storing EV credentials on a FIPS 140-2 security key such as a Yubico might be enough to meet them. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! (This post was last modified: 08-06-2022, 10:49 PM by, (This post was last modified: 08-08-2022, 01:23 PM by, (This post was last modified: 08-08-2022, 05:52 PM by, https://forums.ventoy.net/showthread.phpt=minitool, https://rmprepusb.blogspot.com/2018/11/art-to.html. The only way to make Ventoy boot in secure boot is to enroll the key. It should be the default of Ventoy, which is the point of this issue. I was just objecting to your claim that Secure Boot is useless when someone has physical access to the device, which I don't think is true, as it is still (afaik) required for TPM-based encryption to work correctly. Code that is subject to such a license that has already been signed might have that signature revoked. Extracting the very same efi file and running that in Ventoy did work! Okay, I installed linux mint 64 bit on this laptop before. Most of modern computers come with Secure Boot enabled by default, which is a requirement for Windows 10 certification process. I think it's ok as long as they don't break the secure boot policy. . So, Secure Boot is not required for TPM-based encryption to work correctly. However what currently happens is that people who do have Secure Boot enabled will currently not be alerted to these at all. This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Where can I download MX21_February_x64.iso? But, whereas this is good security practice, that is not a requirement. Say, we disabled validation policy circumvention and Secure Boot works as it should. @BxOxSxS Please test these ISO files in Virtual Machine (e.g. Tested below ISOs on HP ENVY x360- 13-ag0007au (1st-gen Ryzen Mobile convertible laptop, BIOS F.46 Rev.A) with Ventoy 1.0.08 final release in UEFI secure boot mode: Nice job and thanks a lot for this neat tool! Some questions about using KLV-Airedale - Page 9 - Puppy Linux Thank you The fact that it's also able to check if a signed USB installer wasn't tampered with is just a nice bonus. Do I still need to display a warning message? puedes poner cualquier imagen en 32 o 64 bits And if you somehow let bootloaders that shouldn't be trusted through, such as unsigned ones, then it means your whole chain of trust is utterly broken, because there simply cannot even exist a special case for "USB" vs "something else". Can't try again since I upgraded it using another method. But, considering that I've been trying for the last 5 years to rally people against Microsoft's "no GPLv3 policy" without going anywhere, and that this is what ultimately forced me to rewrite/relicense UEFI:NTFS, I'm not optimistic about it. However the solution is not perfect enough. I have installed Ventoy on my USB and I have added ISO file: "Win10SupperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso" unsigned kernel still can not be booted. I have the same error, I can boot from the same usb, the same iso file and the same Ventoy on asus vivobook but not on asus ROG. plzz help. If Ventoy was intended to be used from an internal hard disk, I would agree with you, but Ventoy is a USB-based multiboot solution and therefore the user must have physical access to the system, so it is the users responsibility to be careful about what he inserts into that USB port. It's the job of Ventoy's custom GRUB to ensure that what is being chainloaded is Secure Boot compliant because that's what users will expect from a trustworthy boot application in a Secure Boot environment. If you have a faulty USB stick, then youre likely to encounter booting issues. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5NFuDCZQ00 So if the ISO doesn't support UEFI mode itself, the boot will fail. pentoo-full-amd64-hardened-2020.0_p20200527.iso - 4 GB, avg_arl_cdi_all_120_160420a12074.iso - 178 MB, Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20200419.n.0.iso - 1.80 GB It looks like that version https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases/tag/v1.0.33 fixes issue with my thinkpad. Optional custom shim protocol registration (not included in this build, creates issues). It only causes problems. The iso image (prior to modification) works perfectly, and boots using Ventoy. , ctrl+alt+del . So I don't really see how that could be used to solve the specific problem we are being faced with here, because, however you plan to use UEFI:NTFS when Secure Boot is enabled, your target (be it Ventoy or something else) must be Secure Boot signed. Point 4 from Microsoft's official Secure Boot signing requirements states: Code submitted for UEFI signing must not be subject to GPLv3 or any license that purports to give someone the right to demand authorization keys to be able to install modified forms of the code on a device. So, yeah, it's the same as a safe manufacturer, on seeing that you have a room with extra security (e.g. Copy the efisys.bin from C: > Windows > Boot > DVD > EFI > en-US to your desktop 3. But MediCat USB is already open-source, built upon the open-source Ventoy project. Agreed. But, even as I don't actually support the idea that Secure Boot is useless if someone has physical access to the device (that was mostly Steve positing this as a means to justify that not being able to detect Secure Boot breaches on USB media isn't that big a deal), I do believe there currently still exist a bit too many ways to ensure that you can compromise a machine, if you have access to said machine. @ventoy I have tested on laptop Lenovo Ideapad Z570 and Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso gived same error but with additional information: netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso worked fine. slax 15.0 boots The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: Please give the exact iso file name. Some known process are as follows: How to Create a Multiboot USB With Ventoy - MUO - Technology, Simplified. This means current is Legacy BIOS mode. All of these security things are there to mitigate risks. Ventoy Open Rufus and select the USB flash drive under "Device" and select Extended Windows 11 Installation under Image option. About Fuzzy Screen When Booting Window/WinPE, Ventoy2Disk.exe can't enumerate my USB device. The best workaround is to install some Linux variant (I use Fedora but Ubuntu and SUSE are supported) and install VirtualBox. openSUSE-Tumbleweed-XFCE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200402-Media - 925 MB, star-kirk-2.1.0-xfce-amd64-live.iso - 518 MB, Porteus-CINNAMON-v5.0rc1-x86_64.iso - 300 MB BUT with Ventoy 1.0.74 legacy boot from the same ISO I get a black square in centre of menu (USB LED is flashing so appears to load). Well occasionally send you account related emails. for the suggestions. Hopefully, one of the above solutions help you fix Ventoy if its not working, or youre experiencing booting issues. Well occasionally send you account related emails. If you allow someone physical access to your Secure Boot-enabled system, and you have not disabled USB booting in the BIOS (or booting from CD\DVD), then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. Thank you both for your replies. Inspection of the filesystem within the iso image shows the boot file(s) - including the UEFI bootfile - in the respective directory. Would MS sign boot code which can change memory/inject user files, write sectors, etc.? Keeping Ventoy and ISO files updated can help avoid any future booting issues with Ventoy. On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:25 PM Steve Si ***@***. If you burn the image to a CD, and use a USB CD drive, I bet you find it will install fine. BIOS Mode Both Partition Style GPT Disk . Please test and tell your opinion. i was test in VMWare 16 for rufus, winsetupusb, yumiits okay, https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view?usp=sharing. With this option, in theory, Ventoy can boot fine no matter whether the secure boot in the BIOS is enabled or disabled. That's not at all how I see it (and from what I read above also not @ventoy sees it). Please follow the guid bellow. orel-2.12.22-26.12.2019_13.14.livecd.iso - 1.1 GB Ventoy Forums No bootfile found for UEFI! ? No, you don't need to implement anything new in Ventoy. Ventoy - Easy2Boot I've tried Debian itself, Kubuntu, NEON, and Proxmox, and all freeze after being selected in the Ventoy menu. Already on GitHub? Fedora/Ubuntu/xxx). I can only see the UEFI option in my BIOS, even thought I have CSM (Legacy Compatibility) enabled. It woks only with fallback graphic mode. All the .efi/kernel/drivers are not modified. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. As Ventoy itself is not signed with Microsoft key. due to UEFI setup password in a corporate laptop which the user don't know. Please follow About file checksum to checksum the file. Tested Distros (Updating) I don't have a IA32 hardware device, so I normally test it in VMware. FreeBSD 13.1-RELEASE Aarch64 fails to boot saying "No bootfile found for UEFI!". la imagen iso,bin, etc debe ser de 64 bits sino no la reconoce @MFlisar Hiren's Boot CD was down with UEFI (legacy still has some problem), manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso BOOT I can guarantee you that if you explain the current situation to the vast majority of Ventoy users who enrolled it in a Secure Boot environment, they will tell you that this is not what they expected at all and that what they want, once enrolled, is for Ventoy to only let through UEFI boot loaders that can be validated for Secure Boot and produce the expected Secure Boot warning for the ones that don't. Windows 10 32bit only support IA32 efi, your machine may be x86_64 uefi (amd64 uefi), so this distro can't boot and will show this message. Add firmware packages to the firmware directory. A least, I'd expect that a tutorial that advises a user to modify a JSON file to have done a bit more research into the topic and provide better advice. Does the iso boot from s VM as a virtual DVD? For Hiren's BootCD HBCD_PE_x64.iso has been tested in UEFI mode. However, Ventoy can be affected by anti-virus software and protection programs. If your PC is unable to process Ventoy as bootable media, then you may need to disable secure boot. 2. P.S. And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. Yes, at this point you have the same exact image as I have. privacy statement. You can't. I thought that Secure Boot chain of trust is reused for TPM key sealing, but thinking about it more, that wouldn't really work. https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases/tag/v1.0.33, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5NFuDCZQ00, http://tinycorelinux.net/13.x/x86_64/release/. I've already disabled secure boot. . Yeah, I think UEFI LoadImage()/StarImage(), which is what you'd call to chain load the UEFI bootloader, are set to validate the loaded image for Secure Boot and not launch it for unsigned/broken images, if Secure Boot is enabled (but I admit I haven't formally validated that). Thus, on a system where Secure Boot is enabled, users should rightfully expect to be alerted if the EFI bootloader of an ISO booted through Ventoy is not Secure Boot signed or if its signature doesn't validate. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and I still don't know why it shouldn't work even if it's complex. If a user is booting a lot of unsigned bootloaders with Secure Boot enabled, they clearly should disable Secure Boot in their settings, because, for what they are doing, it is pretty much pointless. Do NOT put the file to the 32MB VTOYEFI partition. Some modern systems are not compatible with Windows 7 UEFI64 (may hang) Please refer github issue/1975, x86 Legacy BIOS, IA32 UEFI, x86_64 UEFI, ARM64 UEFI and MIPS64EL UEFI. With ventoy, you don't need to format the disk over and over, you just need to copy the ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI. Also tested on Lenovo IdeaPad 300 16GB OK (UEFI64). Ventoy should only allow the execution of Secure Boot signed executables when Secure Boot is enabled, Microsoft's official Secure Boot signing requirements. Download non-free firmware archive. All the .efi/kernel/drivers are not modified. Thnx again. and reboot.pro.. and to tinybit specially :) When the user is away again, remove your TPM-exfiltration CPU and place the old one back. Is there a way to force Ventoy to boot in Legacy mode? Tried it yesterday. I suspect that, even as we are not there yet, this is something that we're eventually going to see (but most likely as a choice for the user to install the fully secured or partially secured version of the OS), culminating in OSes where every single binary that runs needs to be signed, and for the certificates those binaries are signed with to be in the chain of trust of OS. Menu Option-->Secure Boot Support for Ventoy2Disk.exe and -s option for Ventoy2Disk.sh I really fail to fathom how people here are disputing that if someone agrees to enroll Ventoy in a Secure Boot environment, it only means that they agree to trust the Ventoy application, and not that they grant it the right to just run whatever bootloader anybody will now be able to throw at their computer through Ventoy (which may very well be a malicious bootloader ran by someone who is not the owner of that computer but who knows or hopes that the user enrolled Ventoy). 6. https://download.freebsd.org/releases/arm64/aarch64/ISO-IMAGES/13.1/FreeBSD-13.1-RELEASE-arm64-aarch64-disc1.iso. SB works using cryptographic checksums and signatures. The problem of manjaro-kde-20.0-pre1-stable-staging-200406-linux56.iso in UEFI booting was an issue in ISO file , resolved on latest released ISO today : @FadeMind But . And that is the right thing to do. Besides, you can try a linux iso file, for example ubuntu-20.04-desktop-amd64.iso, I have the same for Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso but works fine with netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso and HBCD_PE_x64.iso (v1.0.1) Lenovo Ideapad Z580. Tried the same ISOs in Easy2Boot and they worked for me. see http://tinycorelinux.net/13.x/x86_64/release/ Have a question about this project? The same applies to OS/2, eComStation etc. The virtual machine cannot boot. After install, the 1st larger partition is empty, and no files or directories in it. ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi Fix them with this tool: If the advices above haven't solved your issue, your PC may experience deeper Windows problems. I have some systems which won't offer legacy boot option if UEFI is present at the same time.
David Berkowitz Daughter, Convocation Center Dorms Ohio University, Marina Vista Seavey Circle, Articles V